Number

This program generates a 4×4 magic square whose row, column, and diagonal sums equal any number the user inputs. After accepting the number A, it computes a base value B = INT((A−30)/4) and fills a 4×4 grid printed with AT coordinates, using offset arithmetic to place 16 distinct values. Five conditional branches at lines 62–95 handle the four fractional remainders of (A−30)/4 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and the special cases A=31 and A=32), adjusting the diagonal entries to maintain the magic property. The program also validates the input range, nudging the user toward numbers between 31 and 54 as most suitable. Output is formatted across rows 5, 7, 9, and 11 at columns 8, 12, 16, and 20 of the display.

---

Program Analysis

Program Structure

The program is divided into three logical phases: input and validation (lines 10–50), magic square construction and display (lines 55–95), and explanatory output (lines 100–135), followed by a STOP at line 200.

1. Input/Validation (10–50): Prompts the user for a number, echoes it, and prints one of five range-commentary messages.
2. Base Calculation (55): Computes B = INT((A-30)/4), which serves as the offset for every cell value.
3. Grid Display (60–95): Uses PRINT AT to place 16 numbers in a 4×4 layout at fixed screen coordinates. Fractional-remainder branches fine-tune four of the cells.
4. Explanation (100–135): Describes the magic square property to the user.

Magic Square Algorithm

The core technique is a parameterised magic square based on a standard 4×4 template. With a chosen number A, the base B = INT((A-30)/4) is used as an additive offset. The 16 cell values are B+0 through B+18 (not all are used; 16 distinct offsets appear), derived so the four rows, four columns, and two main diagonals each sum to A.

The fractional part of (A-30)/4 can be 0, 0.25, 0.5, or 0.75, corresponding to A mod 4 being 2, 3, 0, or 1 respectively. Lines 62–95 handle each case by substituting four specific cells (the right column and one diagonal group at AT rows 5,7,9,11 and columns 8,12,16,20) with values incremented by a fixed amount, preserving the magic sum.

Grid Layout

The 4×4 grid is printed using PRINT AT row,col;value statements spread across lines 60–95. The screen positions used are:

Row	Col 8	Col 12	Col 16	Col 20
5	B+8	B+5	B+2	(conditional)
7	B+3	(conditional)	B+9	B+4
9	(conditional)	B	B+7	B+10
11	B+6	B+11	(conditional)	B+1

The four “conditional” cells (one per row, forming a diagonal and the rightmost column) are overwritten by whichever fractional-remainder branch fires.

Notable Techniques

• Fractional remainder detection: Rather than using MOD arithmetic, the program compares (A-30)/4 against B+0.25, B+0.5, and B+0.75 using equality tests, which works correctly for integer inputs.
• Special-case lines 62–63: A=31 and A=32 are handled separately before the general fractional branches. This is likely needed because the general formula produces incorrect or out-of-range cell values near the lower boundary (A close to 30), and these two inputs were corrected by hand.
• Chained PRINT AT: Multiple AT clauses are chained in a single PRINT statement, efficiently positioning several values without separate PRINT calls.
• Input nudging: Five messages guide the user toward the 31–54 “sweet spot” where the algorithm is most reliable, though the program still attempts a square for any value.

Potential Bugs and Anomalies

• Line 60 syntax: PRINT AT 5,8;B+8,AT 5,12;B+5,AT 5,16;B+2 uses a comma before the second AT, which in standard Sinclair BASIC separates print items but should work correctly since AT is a valid print item separator in this dialect.
• Line 65 double semicolon: PRINT AT 5,20;;B+16 contains a redundant double semicolon. The extra semicolon is harmless but unnecessary.
• Values near A=30: When A=30, B=0 and (A-30)/4=0, so the B=0 branch at line 95 fires, but some cell values become 0 or negative (e.g., B+0 = 0), which may not form a valid positive magic square.
• Lines 62–63 overlap: The general fractional branches at lines 65, 75, 85, and 95 will also fire for A=31 and A=32 (since their remainders match), potentially overwriting the hand-coded corrections from lines 62–63 with the general formula values.